<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tuxedo Land Trust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tuxedolandtrust.org</link>
	<description>Low Carbon ~ Clean Water ~ Avoided Deforestation ~ Renewable Energy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:56:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Groundwater Supply in the Tuxedo Lake area could be Compromised&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1949</link>
		<comments>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1949#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 07:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TLT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxedolandtrust.org/?p=1949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In an email to the Trustees of the Village of Tuxedo Park, dated December 15th, 2010, Dr. Alexander Gates, Executive Director from the Highlands Environmental Research Institute writes:</p> <p>“The bedrock geology of the Highlands plays a strong role in the quality and quantity of groundwater. The Highlands are composed of 1 billion year old crystalline [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an email to the Trustees of the Village of Tuxedo Park, dated December 15th, 2010, Dr. Alexander Gates, Executive Director from the Highlands Environmental Research Institute writes:</p>
<p>“The bedrock geology of the Highlands plays a strong role in the quality and quantity of groundwater. The Highlands are composed of 1 billion year old crystalline rock that was formed at the base of the highest mountains on Earth. The heat and pressure of their formation eliminated all primary porosity and permeability. These rocks can hold no groundwater except where they contain fractures that formed much later. Normally, groundwater is purified by percolating through the pore spaces in rock and sediment. The water weaves around the mineral grains reacting with them to remove pollutants and squeezing between tight openings between them to remove bacteria and disease. In fractured rock systems, the groundwater flows through open cracks which neither remove pollutants nor bacteria. They work like water pipes in a house. In a case in Ringwood, NJ, a leaking gas station tank resulted in the highest MTBE levels ever measured in a domestic water well that was nearly 1 mile away. Fractures can be oriented in any direction. If there is an extensive network of fractures, groundwater will flow down gradient (slope on the water table). If they are sparse, the water can be directed in virtually any direction, even back under a hill, opposite to the direction of slope. It requires a detailed fracture analysis of an area to determine the direction of groundwater flow.</p>
<p>A recent scientific study that will be published in a professional journal this spring investigated pollution of groundwater around the Sterling Lake mineworks. It was found that several toxic pollutants (chromium, nickel, etc.) were released during mining and smelting operations. It was also found that the top, humus (o-horizon) layer of the soil acted as filter removing the pollutants from infiltrating rain and melt water. As a result, the groundwater is relatively clean in this heavily industrially impacted area. All of the pollutants are contained in the humus layer.</p>
<p>With the combination of removing the humus (pollutant filter) layer of the soil which would occur during development and the unknown orientation and extensiveness of the fracture system of the underlying bedrock, there is a possibility that the groundwater supply in the Tuxedo Lake area could be compromised. The main threats to the supply come from sewage overflow, runoff from roads and landscaping chemicals. Among these chemicals, they can contain disease, dangerous and carcinogenic compounds and compounds that can cause reproductive mutations in wildlife and humans, respectively. Human impact would occur in areas that use private water wells. Runoff of developed areas also typically causes eutrophication of ponds and lakes which kills the fish populations.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Dr. Alexander Gates</p>
<p>Executive Director</p>
<p>Highlands Environmental Research Institute (HEnRI)</p>
<ul>
<li>for more info, go to <a href="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/tuxedo-lake">http://tuxedolandtrust.org/tuxedo-lake</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1949/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 for 10 Campaign</title>
		<link>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1808</link>
		<comments>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1808#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 02:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TLT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxedolandtrust.org/?p=1808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">Top 10 Reasons Why You Should Go 10 for 10</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/donate"></a><a href="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/donate"></a></p> <p>1: The Related Companies has tried to hide the reason for their amendment request: they cannot build according to the 2004 permit because of DEC wetland changes</p> <p>2: The Tuxedo Town Board has ignored blatant mis-leading statements and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>Top 10 Reasons Why You Should Go 10 for 10</strong></span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/donate"></a><a href="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/donate"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/wp-content/images/appdenied19.png" alt="" width="170" height="180" /></a></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">1:  The Related Companies has tried to hide the reason for their amendment request:  they <em><strong>cannot build according to the 2004 permit</strong></em> because of DEC wetland changes</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">2:  The <em><strong>Tuxedo Town Board has ignored blatant mis-leading statements and witholding of information by Tuxedo Reserve</strong></em> in their environmental impact analysis;</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;"> including the <strong>killing of a threatened species</strong> timber rattlesnake on their property while insisting that none are present;</span></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;"> the claim that a historically significant <strong>Revolutionary War</strong> Corduroy Road was built in 2004, thereby <strong>creating a mis-leading tree ring analysis that was later withdrawn</strong>, and possibly engaging in <strong>anticipatory demolition</strong>;</span></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;"> and that the largest single family homes had increased by <strong>550 square feet each, or 58,000 square feet in total</strong>, enough to accomodate another 2 bedrooms each&#8211;or <strong>another 2 school children each, without changing their fiscal analysis.</strong></span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">3:  The Tuxedo Reserve amendment <em><strong>dramatically decreases the number of single family homes by 12%, increases the number of multi-family homes by 41%, and increases the commercial square footage by 1,000%</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">4:  Independent Fiscal consultants, Camoin Associates, estimates that the Tuxedo Reserve amendment will be <em><strong>tax negative by $2,000,000 annually</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">5:  Town Supervisor, Peter Dolan, did not &#8220;readily make available&#8221; a DEC letter to the public that stated that <em><strong>no new sewer hook ups </strong></em>are allowed in the Town of Tuxedo as of January 10th, 2010.  This letter prevents Tuxedo Reserve from building the first 80 houses as approved in the 2004 building permit.  Did Peter Dolan hide the DEC letter from the public?  And if so, why?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">6: If Tuxedo Reserve cannot hook into the Hillburn Sewer Facility in Ramapo, they say they are going to build a new sewer facility in Tuxedo.  Great.  Where is the required hard look by the Tuxedo Town Board?  What is the potential environmental impact on the Ramapo River (1 of only 7 sole source aquifers in New York State and the drinking water for thousands in New York &amp; New Jersey)? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">7:  The new amendment plans for a significant number of new homes to be built around Mountain Lake, and plans for a <em><strong>multi-tiered 4 lane highway with a median divider to be built up to the Tuxedo Park border.  Yet, the Town Board has not asked for any environmental review.</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">8:  Tuxedo Reserve has <strong><em>no viable stormwater plan</em></strong>.  We all remember the March, 2010, stormwater flooding that shut down Route 17 and damaged roads and bridges.  Tuxedo Reserve&#8217;s original stormwater plan was to discharge directly into the Ramapo River.  This practice was dis-allowed by the DEC in February, 2010.  Tuxedo Reserve&#8217;s backup plan is conceptual only, and requires approval from the Rockland County Drainage Agency and the Village of Sloatsburg.  <em><strong>Yet, the Tuxedo Town Board is still going to rubber stamp their approval and rely on other agencies to perform the necessary due diligence on the conceptual stormwater plan! </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">9:  The least talked about issue is <em><strong>Traffic</strong></em>.  Have you ever tried to exit 15A at 5 pm on Monday through Friday?  Cars are bumper to bumper on the highway exit ramp every day.  Imagine what will happen if the population of the Town of Tuxedo doubles from 3,000 to 6,000?  Our transportation reality is that we are a one road town with mountains on one side, and the Ramapo River/Highway 87 on the other side.  Route 17 cannot handle the traffic from a 100% increase in population.  Route 17 will become a parking lot.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">10:  Why has the <em><strong>Tuxedo Town Board blatantly broken the Open Meetings Law?</strong></em> The irony/stupidity of the Robbinsville fiasco is that there was little reason to prevent the public from attending the secret meetings with the developer and town official of Robbinsville.  Which begs the question, <em><strong>what more important things are being hidden from the public by the Tuxedo Town Board?</strong></em></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><em><strong><br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/wp-content/images/tuxedotownboard2.png" alt="" width="530" height="343" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1808/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free Speech Denied, Stormwater Rubber Stamp, &amp; $2 Million Fiscal Error by Town Consultants</title>
		<link>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1660</link>
		<comments>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1660#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TLT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bizarre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bonnie Fransen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boulevard of Broken Dreams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camoin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fabrication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Highway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hysterical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter dolan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School Aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Negative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tuxedo town board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tuxedo union free school district]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbalanced]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxedolandtrust.org/?p=1660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p> <p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p> <p>The Tuxedo Town Board met on Monday evening, August 30th.  There was a large public turn-out to hear Camoin Associates present their Fiscal Analysis of Tuxedo Reserve to the Town Board.  The agenda had 7 items to be addressed, followed by public comments.  The Board was then scheduled to enter Executive Session to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object id="kaltura_player" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="400" height="330" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="name" value="kaltura_player" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="data" value="http://www.kaltura.com/index.php/kwidget/cache_st/1283460355/wid/_210202/uiconf_id/2191631/entry_id/1_w4cf2n2c" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="all" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashVars" value="&amp;" /><param name="src" value="http://www.kaltura.com/index.php/kwidget/cache_st/1283460355/wid/_210202/uiconf_id/2191631/entry_id/1_w4cf2n2c" /><param name="flashvars" value="&amp;" /><embed id="kaltura_player" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="330" src="http://www.kaltura.com/index.php/kwidget/cache_st/1283460355/wid/_210202/uiconf_id/2191631/entry_id/1_w4cf2n2c" flashvars="&amp;" bgcolor="#000000" allowscriptaccess="always" allownetworking="all" data="http://www.kaltura.com/index.php/kwidget/cache_st/1283460355/wid/_210202/uiconf_id/2191631/entry_id/1_w4cf2n2c" allowfullscreen="true" name="kaltura_player"></embed></object></p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">The Tuxedo Town Board met on Monday evening, August 30th.  There was a large public turn-out to hear Camoin Associates present their Fiscal Analysis of Tuxedo Reserve to the Town Board.  The agenda had 7 items to be addressed, followed by public comments.  The Board was then scheduled to enter Executive Session to discuss a Town Police matter.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">In a bizarre break in standard procedure for any Town or Village Board, Town Supervisor Dolan interrupted the schedule after the seventh agenda item, and had the Town Board leave the room for Executive Session before the public comment period.  The public was then forced to wait one hour for the Board to return.  The tactic was obvious and shameless&#8211;Dolan was hoping the public would tire and leave.  No one left.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">During the public comment period, Town Resident Thomas Wilson approached the Town Clerk table where the audio cassette deck is placed to record the public meeting.  Town Supervisor Dolan tried to intimidate Wilson and force him to return to the far side of the room where his voice would not be recorded as clearly as the Town Board members.  Wilson refused, and asked Dolan &#8220;how he could pledge allegiance to the flag behind him and not allow the right to free speech.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">In another bizarre Dolan moment, the Town Supervisor actually stood up, walked towards the Clerk&#8217;s table and said he would unplug the tape deck and take it to Wilson&#8217;s seat on the other side of the room.  The Town Clerk offered a compromise for Wilson to take three steps back to a chair and ask his questions.  Dolan and the Board finally consented.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Wilson asked the Board if they were going to require an environmental study of Tuxedo Reserve&#8217;s newly proposed 4 lane highway to Mountain Lake.  The highway will be 60 feet wide, steep, multi-tiered, and have a median divider.  Dolan replied &#8220;no.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Wilson then asked the Board if they were going to vote on Tuxedo Reserve before Rockland County or Sloatsburg voted on Tuxedo Reserve&#8217;s new Stormwater Management &#8220;Plan.&#8221;  The original plan to discharge into the Ramapo River was denied by the DEC in February, 2010.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">&#8230;..<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><img class="alignnone" src="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/wp-content/images/flood.png" alt="" width="474" height="316" /></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><em>(courtesy of <a href="http://tpfyi.com">tpfyi.com</a>)</em><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Their new plan is conceptual only and no detailed plans have been presented.  Despite FEMA flooding last Spring, and the Board&#8217;s responsibility as Lead Agency under SEQRA, Dolan said they would vote on Tuxedo Reserve before Rockland or Sloatsburg voted.  In essence, the Tuxedo Town Board is rubber stamping a &#8220;conceptual  only&#8221; Stormwater Management Plan!</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Dolan further demonstrated his bias for Tuxedo Reserve by waving the Camoin Fiscal Analysis in the air, claiming it was a &#8220;fabrication.&#8221;<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/workshop-videos/8910-fiscal-impact">The Camoin analysis from August 6th</a>, states that Tuxedo Reserve:</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;">Incorrectly accounts for changes to State Aid to Schools;</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;">Incorrectly accounts for new property tax revenues to the Town, School District &amp; other districts;</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;">Undercounts School District costs; and</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;">Overcounts the amount of new sales tax revenue to be received during the years when Project is under development.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;">Overstates tax benefits by $2 million per year; project probably tax negative</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Their follow up report on August 30th, analyzes:</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;">Overstatement of Property Tax Revenue from Commercial/Industrial Sources by $300,000 per year</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;">Calculation of Number of School Aged Children to increase from addition of 58,000 residential square feet; thereby increasing Tuxedo School District costs (not calculated by Tuxedo Reserve)</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;">Calculation of Residential Assessed Value overstates property tax revenues by $230,000</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><em>(see report below)</em></span></p>
<p><!-- 		@page { margin: 0.79in } 		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } --><span style="font-size: medium;">Saving his most sagacious moment of the evening for an exchange with Michael N&#8217;dolo from Camoin Assoicates, <strong>Town Supervisor Dolan stated emphatically that $70 is the current figure received by the School District per pupil. </strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">The following day, Camoin Associates visited the <strong>New York State Comptroller’s website.</strong> The Tuxedo Union Free School District received $1,186,122 in state aid for education in 2008.  In 2008, there were 310 “aidable” pupils, which corresponds to <strong>$3,826 per aidable pupil</strong>. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Arrogance and ignorance is a dangerous skill set for a Town Supervisor.</span></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p><a href="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/83010-2"><em><span style="font-size: medium;">Click on this link to see video statements from Jim Hays, Steve Gross, Thomas Wilson, John Kilduff, John Kwasnicki, and Michael N&#8217;dolo</span></em></a></p>
<p><em><span style="font-size: medium;">&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
</span></em></p>
<p><img src="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/wp-content/camoin/8.30.10a.png" alt="" width="580" height="822" /><br />
<img class="alignnone" src="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/wp-content/camoin/8.30.10b.png" alt="" width="580" height="732" /><br />
<img class="alignnone" src="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/wp-content/camoin/8.30.10c.png" alt="" width="580" height="106" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1660/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Related Companies Increases Housing by 58,000 square feet to Mislead Public on &quot;3.4%&quot; Price Drop</title>
		<link>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1541</link>
		<comments>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1541#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 19:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TLT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camoin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cottage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dolan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft FSEIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Workshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Higher Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing Square Footage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[related companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tuxedo Park]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxedolandtrust.org/?p=1541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It seems like every day brings a new discovery of Fraud &#38; Mis-Representation by the Related Companies in their Draft FSEIS to the Town of Tuxedo. </p> <p>Catch of the Day</p> Two different sets of numbers regarding housing square footage and housing prices DSEIS pdf appendix page 74, and FSEIS pdf appendix page 1011<br /> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: medium;">It seems like every day brings a new discovery of Fraud &amp; Mis-Representation by the Related Companies in their Draft FSEIS to the Town of Tuxedo. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><em>Catch of the Day</em></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;">Two different sets of numbers regarding housing square footage and housing prices</span>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;">DSEIS</span><span style="font-size: medium;"> pdf appendix page 74, and FSEIS pdf appendix page 1011<br />
</span></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;">Estate home square footage increases from 4,350 to 4,900</span></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;">Manor home square footage increases from 3,400 to 3,950</span></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;">Cottage  square footage increases from 2,200 to 2,500</span></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;">Net increase in residential square footage&#8211;<em>58,000</em></span></li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: medium;"><em>Tuxedo Reserve&#8217;s new market study concludes prices per square foot dropped by 14.3% since 2008<br />
</em></span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: medium;"><em>Curiously, the same market study shows actual home prices dropped by just 3.4% since 2008<br />
</em></span></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;">Why the discrepancy?  By increasing the project square footage, the Related Companies can mis-represent a  supposed 3.4% drop in home prices</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><em>Who in this community, or nation wide, has seen just a 3.4% drop in home prices from 2008?<br />
</em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Larger homes also means more bedrooms for school children; which means that the School Analysis of expenditures and taxes needs to be re-done</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;"><em><strong>further increasing a $2,000,000 annual tax deficit</strong></em><br />
</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Guess what properties they used for comparables?</span></p>
<ul>
<li><em><span style="font-size: medium;">larger, lake front homes in gated Tuxedo Park</span> <span style="font-size: large;"><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">!!!</span></strong></span></em></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">It is no wonder that the Related Companies has failed housing developments across the country, or more tragically, </span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: medium;">a trail of tax burdened communities who believed the hype and now pay the price after Related cuts and runs to the next naive (<em>or incentivized?</em>) Town Board.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><em>Observations</em><br />
</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;">Why has the Tuxedo Town Board still not asked the Related Companies one question about their well documented, fraudulent tree ring submission?</span></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;">On August 5th, Dolan flipped to Related&#8217;s side once again when presented with a proposal that substantially increased the public roads in the project, thereby increasing the Town&#8217;s liability and maintenance costs.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><strong>Monday, August 9th, 5:30 pm, Tuxedo Town Hall</strong>&#8211;Fiscal &amp; Economic Workshop<br />
</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><em>Come watch the charade</em><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1541/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Related Companies Mis-States Tuxedo Reserve&#8217;s Fiscal Impact on Town (now iPad compatible)</title>
		<link>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1528</link>
		<comments>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1528#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 08:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TLT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camoin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negative Fiscal Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negative Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overcounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overstates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overstates by $700k Annually]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overstates Property Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State School Aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Undercounts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxedolandtrust.org/?p=1528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Developer replicates errors from Original Analysis in Draft FSEIS</p> Incorrectly overstates future State School Aid by $700,000 annually Incorrectly overstates future Property Tax Revenues by $530,000 annually Undercounts School District Costs by $430,000 annually Overcounts New Sales Tax Revenues during construction by $310,000 <p>Total Negative Fiscal Impact ~ $2,000,000 annually</p> <p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://wp.me/PIv49-os">click here [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><strong>Developer replicates errors from Original Analysis in Draft FSEIS</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;">Incorrectly overstates future State School Aid by $700,000 <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>annually</em></span></span></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;">Incorrectly overstates future Property Tax Revenues by $530,000 <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>annually</em></span></span></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;">Undercounts School District Costs by $430,000 <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>annually </em></span></span></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;">Overcounts New Sales Tax Revenues during construction by $310,000</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><strong>Total Negative Fiscal Impact ~ $2,000,000 <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>annually</em></span></strong></span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong><a href="http://wp.me/PIv49-os"><em><span style="font-size: medium;">click here to go to Fiscal Analysis Page</span></em></a></strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><strong><em><a href="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/wp-content/camoin/fiscal.pdf">click to download Camoin Fiscal Analysis</a></em></strong></span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: medium;"><strong>Monday, August 9th~</strong></span></strong><span style="font-size: medium;">Town Board Fiscal Workshop at Town Hall<strong> </strong><em>(5:30 pm?)</em><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1528/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>W3R Federal Trail Historian Says Corduroy Road Part of Continental Road</title>
		<link>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1230</link>
		<comments>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1230#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TLT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1776]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cannonball Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continental road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Continental Road System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corduroy road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cornell Tree Ring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonald Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYSHPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pension Application Files]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revolutionary war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ringwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Erskine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Selig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secret Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simeon DeWitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy Pickering Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[w3r]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington-Rochambeau]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxedolandtrust.org/?p=1230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Historian for the Washington-Rochambeau Route National Historic Trail (W3R-NHT), Robert Selig, responds to letter from NYSHPO and Cornell Tree Ring expert:<br /> </p> <p>&#8220;&#8230;comment on your statement that the segment &#8220;is not part of the 18th-century Continental Road system.&#8221; You base your assessment on &#8220;construction techniques employed and log diameter.&#8221; It may well be that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Historian for the Washington-Rochambeau Route National Historic Trail (W3R-NHT), Robert Selig, responds to letter from NYSHPO and Cornell Tree Ring expert:<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">&#8220;&#8230;comment on your statement that the segment &#8220;is not part of the 18<sup>th</sup>-century  Continental Road system.&#8221; You base your assessment on &#8220;construction  techniques employed and log diameter.&#8221; It may well be that the logs  currently <em>in situ </em>are of 19<sup>th</sup>-century origin, but that  does not, in my opinion, invalidate the <strong>strong likely-hood that the  roadbed itself where these logs are found today is of 18<sup>th</sup>-century  origin. </strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">The Continental Road system was a network of roads that  expanded considerably during the American War of Independence from its  pre-war extend. This expansion was driven by the need to have a set of  alternate routes to keep supplies for Washington&#8217;s army in New Jersey  from falling into British hands. These roads, many of which were  surveyed by Robert Erskine and his successor Simeon DeWitt of Ringwood,  were known under various names such as &#8220;The Secret Road&#8221; or &#8220;Cannonball  Road&#8221;. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Their existence and use are well known but can, and should, be  further documented by additional research in lesser-used sources such as  pension applications. It is particularly in those records that I have  lately found information not only on the use of these roads, but also on  their location(s): e.g., waggoners occasionally mention even the names  of farmers where they stopped on their way to and from New Jersey.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">If,  as <strong>I tend to believe, the existing road section in question is part of  the Continental Road, this would create a side-trail of the  Washington-Rochambeau Revolutionary Route National Historic Trail  (W3R-NHT) signed into law by President Obama in March 2009.</strong> Based upon  my research on the roads taken by the Franco-American armies on their  way to and from Yorktown in 1781 and 1782 as project historian for the  W3R-NHT and as the historian responsible for the 2001 &#8220;W3R in New York&#8221;  survey, I would therefore <strong>strongly recommend</strong> that some in-depth research  be conducted in the Erskine-DeWitt maps, the Timothy Pickering Papers,  the McDonald Papers, the Pension Application files and similar resources  <strong>to accurately identify and delineate the Revolutionary War Continental  Road network before this road segment is written off as originating in  the 19<sup>th</sup> century.&#8221;</strong></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1230/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corduroy Road Recant by Cornell Tree Ring Dept. in Tuxedo Reserve Draft FSEIS submitted to the Town of Tuxedo</title>
		<link>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1208</link>
		<comments>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1208#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 07:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TLT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APOLOGIZE TO ALL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archaeology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continental road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corduroy road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cornell Tree Ring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dendrochronologic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dendrochronological]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[does not make sense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fseis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Questionable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[related companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tentative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[well-drilling crew]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxedolandtrust.org/?p=1208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> </p> <p>Below is a letter from the Cornell Tree-Ring Lab, dated July 22nd, 2010</p> Video of a visit to the Corduroy Road site with representatives from The Related Companies  can be seen at this link&#8211;<a href="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/corduroy-road">http://tuxedolandtrust.org/corduroy-road</a> <p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p> <p><a href="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/corduroy road fraud.png"></a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- 		@page { margin: 0.79in } 		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } --><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: TimesNewRoman,Bold,serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><strong> </strong></span></span></span></p>
<p><em>Below is a letter from the Cornell Tree-Ring Lab</em>, <em>dated July 22nd, 2010</em></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: small;">Video of a visit to the Corduroy Road site with representatives from The Related Companies  can be seen at this link&#8211;<a href="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/corduroy-road">http://tuxedolandtrust.org/corduroy-road</a></span></li>
</ul>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p><a href="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/corduroy road fraud.png"><img class="alignleft" src="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/corduroy road fraud.png" alt="" width="610" height="1034" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1208/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Related Companies Overstates School Aid by $696,465 per year.  That $700,000 annual deficit would have to be subsidized by a School Property Tax Increase!</title>
		<link>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1187</link>
		<comments>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1187#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 21:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TLT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camoin Associates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carvel Property Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal & School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gag Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenwood Lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mis-representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overstating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pine Plains Central School District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[related companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School Property Tax Increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Town of Tuxedo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tuxedo School District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wealth Ratio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxedolandtrust.org/?p=1187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Why has the Town of Tuxedo Put a Gag Order on their Consultants? Maybe because The Related Companies is overstating school aid by $696,465 per year? That $700,000 annual deficit would have to be subsidized by a School Property Tax Increase!</p> <p>It is no wonder that the Town of Tuxedo is trying to divert the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- 		@page { margin: 0.79in } 		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } --><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;">Why has the Town of Tuxedo Put a Gag Order on their Consultants?  Maybe because The Related Companies is overstating school aid by <span style="color: #000000;"><strong>$696,465 per year</strong></span>?  That <strong>$700,000 annual deficit would have to be subsidized by a School Property Tax Increase!</strong></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;">It is no wonder that the Town of Tuxedo is trying to divert the publics&#8217; attention from the environmental impact of Tuxedo Reserve by hiring consultants to focus on the Fiscal &amp; School Study.  The irony is that the The Related Companies has extended their pattern of mis-representation to even the Fiscal &amp; School Study. </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="color: #000000;">In response to Camoin Associates’ previous comments, </span><span style="color: #000000;">The Related Companies is essentially saying that state aid formulas are too complex, and that the Applicant should just assume per-pupil state aid will remain the same whether or not the project is built.  So, The Related Companies has replicated the fiscal analysis assuming that state aid per pupil remains constant.</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="color: #000000;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;">Camoin Associates worked on a similar peer review two years ago for the Town of Pine Plains.  As with Tuxedo, the proposed project was a similar housing development that would significantly change the population of the host Town.  The developer commissioned a study into the state aid question titled, “State Aid to the Pine Plains Central School District Projection Methodology,” dated January 11, 2008.  After 25 pages, the study concluded:</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="color: #000000;"> </span></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="color: #000000;">“<span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;">The preceding analysis clearly indicates that if built, the Carvel Property Development will influence the amount in State Aid that the Pine Plains Central School District would receive on a per-pupil basis.  Specifically, both a second home and comparative primary home scenario would likely lead to a decrease in State Aid, projected to be in the order of approximately <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>$2,400 less in aid per pupil</strong></span>, per year.”</span></span></span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="color: #000000;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;">However, the summary continues by saying that some of that decrease may be attributable to other factors including trends in population and wealth happening irrespective of the development.  The analysis then projects that the difference between state aid with the development and without the development is <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>$945 per pupil</strong></span>.  (See Table B.21, Summary of Impacts to State Aid, line “Projected State Aid/Pupil” in the aforementioned document). </span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="color: #000000;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;">So, what could this mean for the Tuxedo School District?  The Tuxedo Reserve project is slated to add 427 pupils to the school districts’ 310 “aidable pupils” (non-resident pupils from Greenwood Lake must be excluded.)  Therefore, total aidable pupils would be 737. </span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;">If the Tuxedo project has a similar impact as the Pine Plains project on state aid per pupil, it means that <strong>The Related Companies would be overstating school aid by $696,465 per year</strong> upon full buildout.  <strong>That $700,000 annual deficit would have to be filled by a school property tax levy.</strong></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><em>&#8230;stay tuned, tomorrow&#8217;s post may surprise you&#8230;</em><br />
</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1187/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tuxedo Town Attorney Gags Town Consultant Over Related Companies&#039; School District Mis-Calculation</title>
		<link>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1175</link>
		<comments>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1175#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 04:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TLT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andrew dance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonnie franson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camoin Associates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[combined wealth ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cwr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fseis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gary phelps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larry wolinsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lisa spivak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter dolan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[related companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[res group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tom darling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Town of Tuxedo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tuxedo reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tuxedo union free school district]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxedolandtrust.org/?p=1175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Tuxedo Town Attorney directs Town Consultant &#8220;not to respond to your inquiry.&#8221;  Below is the request from TLT Consultant, Camoin Associates, to Town Consultant, RES Group:</p> <p>&#8220;Camoin Associates provided certain comments on the DSEIS, two of which are listed as Comment 3-33 and Comment 3-34 of the draft FSEIS. These two comments refer to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><span style="font-size: medium;">Tuxedo Town Attorney directs Town Consultant &#8220;not to respond to your inquiry.&#8221;  Below is the request from TLT Consultant, Camoin Associates, to Town Consultant, RES Group:</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">&#8220;Camoin Associates provided certain comments on the DSEIS, two of which are listed as Comment 3-33 and Comment 3-34 of the draft FSEIS.  These two comments refer to the importance of calculating the impact of the Project on the amount of state aid provided to the school district, particularly with respect to the Combined Wealth Ratio (CWR).  We disagreed with the methodology employed in the DSEIS in that it ignored changes to the CWR caused by the Project and thus changes to state aid per pupil.  In Responses 3-33 and 3-34, the Related Companies provided various counter arguments and, critically, state that,</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">“the methodology for calculating state aid, which was established in the FEIS, was re-evaluated by RES and confirmed to be accurate.”  (See last sentence of Response 4-34 on page 3.3-27).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">However, in your memo to Bonnie Franson titled “Draft Initial Review of Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement” dated March 31, 2010, you state on bullet point 3 that,</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">“the analysis does not appear to consider the potential impact that Tuxedo Reserve will have on the wealth of the Tuxedo Union Free School District.  Since wealth is a factor in determining the amount of State Aid a district receives, please consider its impact.”</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Given this confusion, I would ask that you please verify whether or not RES Group in fact agreed with the methodology employed in the DSEIS for the calculation of state aid to the Tuxedo Union Free School District.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><em><strong><span style="font-size: medium;">Full correspondence can be seen at <a href="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/draft-fseis">http://tuxedolandtrust.org/draft-fseis</a></span></strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1175/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is Tuxedo Supervisor Dolan working on behalf of  the Related Companies?  Dolan&#039;s response: &quot;none of your business.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1150</link>
		<comments>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1150#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TLT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Gromack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andrew dance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris St. Lawrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarkstown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarkstown Supervisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft FSEIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Hays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Graetzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter dolan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[related companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rockland County Sewer District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tuxedo Supervisor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxedolandtrust.org/?p=1150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p> <p>Several weeks ago, Tuxedo Supervisor Dolan revealed to the public that he met with Clarkstown Supervisor, Alex Gromack. Gromack is a member of the Rockland County Sewer District which operates the Hillburn Sewer Facility.  Several months ago, the <a href="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/422-video">Rockland County Sewer District declared that Tuxedo Reserve cannot hook into the Hillburn Facility</a>.  Yet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/wp-content/images/tuxedotownboard2.png" alt="" width="530" height="343" /></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Several weeks ago, Tuxedo Supervisor Dolan revealed to the public that he met with Clarkstown Supervisor, Alex Gromack. Gromack is a member of the Rockland County Sewer District which operates the Hillburn Sewer Facility.  Several months ago, the <a href="http://tuxedolandtrust.org/422-video">Rockland County Sewer District declared that Tuxedo Reserve cannot hook into the Hillburn Facility</a>.  Yet Dolan wanted to ask Gromack if the issue could be re-visited.  <strong> </strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: medium;"><strong>Why is Dolan acting on behalf of the Related Companies? </strong></span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">When asked why he met with Gromack at the June 28th Town Board meeting, Dolan essentially replied &#8220;none of your business.<strong>&#8220;  Wrong answer.  As an elected official, it is the public&#8217;s business to know why their Town Supervisor is trying to reverse a <em>past</em> Rockland County Sewer decision regarding a developer who has submitted an application  for him to currently vote on.</strong> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">At a Tuxedo Town Board meeting two weeks ago, Dolan promised the public that they would be provided an un-edited copy of the &#8220;independent&#8221; fiscal study that is still unfinished after six months.  <strong>Somehow the Related Companies obtained a copy before the public</strong> and incorporated it into their Draft Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement</span>.  <span style="font-size: medium;">This FSEIS was submitted to the town on Thursday, June 24th, and appears on the <a href="http://www.tuxedogov.org">town website</a>.  Yet Dolan claims that the &#8220;independent&#8221; study is still not complete and not available for public review, <em>unless you look at the version already submitted by the Related Companies.</em></span></p>
<p><object id="kaltura_player" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="400" height="330" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="name" value="kaltura_player" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="data" value="http://www.kaltura.com/index.php/kwidget/cache_st/1277851722/wid/_210202/uiconf_id/48130/entry_id/0_gnor2vr2" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="all" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashVars" value="&amp;" /><param name="src" value="http://www.kaltura.com/index.php/kwidget/cache_st/1277851722/wid/_210202/uiconf_id/48130/entry_id/0_gnor2vr2" /><embed id="kaltura_player" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="330" src="http://www.kaltura.com/index.php/kwidget/cache_st/1277851722/wid/_210202/uiconf_id/48130/entry_id/0_gnor2vr2" flashvars="&amp;" bgcolor="#000000" allowscriptaccess="always" allownetworking="all" data="http://www.kaltura.com/index.php/kwidget/cache_st/1277851722/wid/_210202/uiconf_id/48130/entry_id/0_gnor2vr2" allowfullscreen="true" name="kaltura_player"></embed></object></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Video Highlights:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Jim Hays, Trustee for Village of Tuxedo Park, minute 2:10</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Andrew Dance, Project Manager for Tuxedo Reserve, minute 8:53</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Mary Graetzer, Reporter for www.tpfyi.com, minute 12:45</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Thomas Wilson, Tuxedo Land Trust, minute 17:00</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Classic picture of Tuxedo Town Board listening to public comments, minute 20:22</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Peter Dolan, Tuxedo Town Supervisor, None of Your Business Brush Off, minute 22:18<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span><span style="font-size: medium;"><em> </em></span></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><em> </em></span></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tuxedolandtrust.org/archives/1150/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  tuxedolandtrust.org/feed ) in 0.63691 seconds, on May 20th, 2012 at 9:36 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 20th, 2012 at 9:37 pm UTC -->
